Hitler's debt to America
"There is today one state in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but [the US], in which an effort is made to consult reason at least partially. By refusing immigrants on principle to elements in poor health, by simply excluding certain races from naturalisation, it professes in slow beginnings a view that is peculiar to the People's State."  "The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective offspring is a demand of clearest reason and, if systematically executed, represents the most humane act of mankind. It will spare millions of unfortunates undeserved sufferings, and consequently will lead to a rising improvement of health as a whole." 
"Now that we know the laws of heredity, it is possible to a large extent to prevent unhealthy and severely handicapped beings from coming into the world. I have studied with interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock." 

Curbing Global Population Growth: Rockefeller’s Population Council
Background. Throughout the first half of the twentieth century, the Rockefeller Foundation had been a significant contributor to broad advances in medical research and efforts in worldwide disease eradication. In contemplating the work of the foundation his grandfather created, John D. Rockefeller III began to believe that a reduction in mortality resulting from his family’s foundation efforts in medicine, without a corresponding decline in fertility rates, could contribute to unsustainable population growth, particularly in developing countries. In the late 1940s, a Rockefeller Foundation-sponsored team returning from Asia noted that an imminent worldwide surge in population growth demanded immediate action.369 Rapid worldwide population growth was known to be taking place, but scholarship on population and demography lacked organization and coherence in part because of the complexity of the problem of population growth and because of the cultural and religious sensitivities implicated in fertility issues. Rockefeller, however, felt complexities of rising population growth and sensitivities of birth control should not inhibit the needed focus of science and public policy....

Strategy. In the early 1950s, Rockefeller... Provide(d) the financial support for a two-day conference, held under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences, the president of which was also the president of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.371 When the Rockefeller Foundation declined to take up population growth as an issue of concern, Rockefeller formed the Population Council as an independent entity.372 He provided an initial gift of $100,000 to enable the Council to begin its work.
The Council’s charter members were Frank Notestein, demographer at Princeton University who urged attention be given to high fertility rates; Frederick Osborn, influential proponent of population research; Thomas Parran, dean of the Graduate School of Public Health at the University of Pittsburgh; and John D. Rockefeller, III. Shortly after its formation, Rockefeller provided an additional grant of $1.25 million to the Council over five years. The Ford Foundation also made an early contribution to the Council, a grant of $600,000.374 Later financial backers included the Rockefeller, Mellon, Hewlett, and Packard Foundations.
When public attention began to focus on population issues in the 1960s and 1970s, alumni of the Council’s fellowship program were already placed and prepared to steer policy. The United States, under the Kennedy administration, began to adopt foreign policy positions on global population reflecting Rockefeller’s concerns articulated a decade earlier. [...]

US official depopulation policy
4/24/74 Henry Kissinger, NSSM 200
“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world wherever a lessening of population pressures..can increase prospects for stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and the interests of the United States especially from less developed countries... Injectable contraceptives for women as a possible method of population reduction and control..."

Bill Gates talks about ‘vaccines to reduce population’
by F. William Engdahl http://www.voltairenet.org/article164347.html
Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy: population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics....

Population Council
Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey Discuss Coming Together 'to Do More'

Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation
5/24/09 Times of London, 
Some of America’s leading billionaires met secretly May 5 in Manhattan to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population. Described as the Good Club by one insider, it included David Rockefeller Jr, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey... agreed overpopulation was a priority...a consensus emerged to back a strategy with population growth tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat. 

The Human Genome Project and Eugenics
Robert Lederman Daily Telegraph (London) 7/7/00, Gazette Baltimore Sun 1/22/99, Salt Lake City Tribune 1/27/99
The Human Genome Project may now open the door to the development and use of genetic weapons targeted at specific ethnic groups. This project is currently being conducted under the auspices ofthe U.S. Energy Department, which also oversees America’s nuclear weapon arsenal....The November 1970 issue of the Military Review article [was] entitled “Ethnic Weapons” for command-level military personnel. The author was Dr. Carl Larson, head of the Department of Human Genetics at the Institute of Genetics in Lund, Sweden.... A biological weapon could conceivably take advantage of this genetic variance and incapacitate or kill an entire population.... On November 15, 1998, the London Times reported that Israel claimed to have successfully developed a genetically specific “ethnic bullet” that targets Arabs. When an Israeli government spokesman was asked to confirm the existence of ethnic weapons, he did not deny that they had them, but rather said, “we have a basket full of serious surprises that we will not hesitate to use if we feel that the state of Israel is under serious threat.”.

U.S. Military Review “Ethnic Weapons”
Pentagon DARPA Commissions 1970 study on ethnic weapons conducted by the Battelle Institute ...
11/70 ”http://www.sunshine-project.org/publications/pr/pdf/pr190202.pdf
"...genetic variations in races are concurrent with differences in tolerances for various substances. For instance, large segments of Southeast Asian populations display lactose intolerance due to absence of lactase enzyme in the digestive system. A biological weapon could conceivably take advantage of this genetic variance and incapacitate or kill an entire population. 

Ensuring Israel's QME (Qualitative Military Edge)
Andrew J. Shapiro, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs addresses The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
11/4/11  http://www.state.gov/t/pm/rls/rm/176684.htm
President Obama said: “the United States sees the historic changes sweeping the Middle East and North Africa as a moment of great challenge, but also a moment of opportunity for greater peace and security for the entire region, including the State of Israel.”…"A Strong Partnership Supports U.S. National Security. So let me first turn to why this relationship is so important to the United States….The most direct tool the US uses to ensure Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge is security assistance. For some three decades, Israel has been the leading beneficiary of US security assistance through the Foreign Military Financing program, FMF...each year Israel accounts for 60% of U.S. security assistance funding distributed through FMF....Our total FMF funding amounts to $5.5 billion per year, of which more than 80% goes to the supporting our partners and allies in the Middle East....Ensuring Israel’s military strength and its superiority in the region, is critical to regional stability and as a result is fundamentally a core interest of the United States. The United States and Israel also see eye to eye on host of strategic questions. Indeed, a new Washington Institute report by Robert Blackwill and Walter Slocombe articulates the strategic benefits of the relationship for the United States...” Israel is a vital ally and serves as a cornerstone of our regional security commitments.... 

US Ups Israel's QME
6/13/13 http://www.defensenews.com/article/20130613/DEFREG/306130022/
...US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel in April, announced Washington “would make available to Israel a set of advanced new military capabilities” to augment Israel’s qualitative military edge.[QME]

Government Population Control: A Secret of American Foreign Policy
JAN 10, 2020
... United States National Security Council is the highest ... United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Population Services ...

USAID, population control, and NGO-Led democratization in Egypt...
USAID, population control, NGO-Led democratization in Egypt: The fate of ..In response to critical situation the Egyptian National Population Council ...

Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society by Dr José Delgado
25 August 2007
We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated.
--1974 Congressional Testimony of Dr. Jose Delgado
The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electronically control the brain. Someday armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.
--Dr. Jose Delgado, Director of Neuropsychiatry Yale University Medical School Congressional Record, No. 26, Vol. 118 February 24, 1974
The technology for nonsensory communication between brains and computers through the intact skin is already at our fingertips, and its consequences are difficult to predict. In the past the progress of civilization has tremendously magnified the power of our senses, muscles, and skills. Now we are adding a new dimension: the direct interface between brains and machines. Although true, this statement is perhaps too spectacular and it requires cautious clarification. Our present knowledge regarding the coding of information, mechanisms of perception, and neuronal bases of behavior is so elemental that it is highly improbable that electrical correlates of thoughts or emotions could be picked up, transmitted, and electrically applied to the suitable structure of a different subject in order to be recognized and to trigger related thoughts or emotions. It is, however, already possible to induce a large variety of responses, from motor effects to emotional reactions and intellectual manifestations, by direct electrical stimulation of the brain. Also, several investigators have learned to identify patterns of electrical activity (which a computer could also recognize) localized in specific areas of the brain and related to determined phenomena such as perception of smells or visual perception of edges and movements. We are advancing rapidly in the pattern recognition of electrical correlates of behavior and in the methodology for two-way radio communication between brain and computers.
We are advancing rapidly in the pattern recognition of electrical correlates of behavior and in the methodology for two-way radio communication between brain and computers. Fears have been expressed that this new technology brings with it the threat of possible unwanted and unethical remote control of the cerebral activities of man by other men, but as will be discussed later, this danger is quite improbable and is outweighed by the expected clinical and scientific benefits. Electronic knowledge and microminiaturization have progressed so much that the limits appear biological rather than technological. Our greatest need is for more experimental information about the neuronal mechanisms related to behavioral and mental processes, and research in unrestricted subjects promises to reveal new understanding of normal minds and more efficient therapy of disturbed 

B2 Human Brain Control
Cite this
(PDF) B2 Human Brain Control www En tylko w only in En
Jun 26, 2016 ...Dr. Jose Delgado at Yale University, Nobel Prize ... Rockefeller to create the Commission.....

The Hidden History of Psychotronic Experimentation on Involuntary Human Subjects
Alex Constantine – 1994
Psychotronics /delgado mia emailed [https://www.churchofmabusradio.com/2018/08/13/the-hidden-history-of-psychotronic-experimentation-on-involuntary-human-subjects-alex-constantine-1994/]
....On May 6, Dr. Delgado, the Spanish bull-tamer and postwar Yale researcher, closed a lecture on the evolution of the brain at the American Museum of Natural History in New York with the announcement that “science has developed a new electrical methodology for the study and control of cerebral function in animals and humans.”...Encouraged by the progress in transforming human beings into cordless automatons, the CIA picked up the pace... a CIA manual was prepared on the electronic wizardry of Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control (RHIC), originally developed by the Pentagon, according to a 1975 issue of Modern People:.......

Human Betterment Foundation
.. The Human Betterment Foundation (HBF) American eugenics organization established in Pasadena, California

US influence op for ‘population council’
Philanthropy's Original Sin
by William A. Schambra - Hudson Institute
Oct 1, 2013 ... Eugenics American philanthropy's first great global success. ...Rockefeller family and Carnegie Institution funds... population control programs tied to foreign aid....After all, eugenics had begun to point the way to a bold, hopeful human future through the application of the rapidly advancing natural sciences and the newly forming social sciences to human problems....By investing in the progress and application of these fields, foundations boasted they could delve down to the very roots of social problems, rather than merely treating their symptoms. Just as tracking physiological diseases back to parasites and microbes had begun to eliminate the sources of many medical ailments, so tracking social pathology — crime, pauperism, dipsomania, and “feeblemindedness,” a catch-all term for intellectual disabilities — back to defective genes would allow us to attack it at its source...unlike charity. As John D. Rockefeller put it, “the best philanthropy is constantly in search of the finalities — a search for cause, an attempt to cure evils at their source.”...Foundation grants would pave the way for this transfer of authority: as one Rockefeller report put it, the foundation’s funding was designed to “increase the body of knowledge which in the hands of competent technicians may be expected in time to result in substantial social control.”...
In 1910 able to open the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) adding it to the NY Station for Experimental Evolution at Cold Spring Harbor launched earlier by the Washington Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller...and Carnegie Institution.. added funds to the Eugenics Record Office.[ERO]...
a remarkably aggressive and effective institution, skillfully deploying all the available scientific, cultural, and political tools at its disposal to promote its cause. As the top independently funded eugenics institution in the United States, ERO activities ranged from scientific and policy research, to public education and political advocacy, to training expert field workers...to track the “stream of weak and susceptible protoplasm” into every nook and cranny of the nation....In the notorious 1927 Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell which upheld the constitutionality of state sterilization laws, Laughlin even provided a deposition confirming Carrie Buck’s feeblemindedness without ever having laid eyes on her.....

But philanthropy’s involvement in eugenics went far beyond the success of the ERO. The Rockefeller Foundation helped fund research institutions in Germany behind the Nazi programs of sterilization and euthanasia....also supported the work of French surgeon and biologist Alexis Carrel, who earned him a Nobel Prize in 1912 > . While working at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (today Rockefeller University), Carrel wrote his bestseller Man, the Unknown (1935), which lent his prestige to eugenics, suggested the use of gas to euthanize lawbreakers, and in a later edition endorsed the German “suppression” of “the defective.” ... less famous and wealthy donors also had a huge influence on state and local eugenics programs. Dr. John Harvey Kellogg, co-inventor of corn flakes and a promoter of various causes and treatments that blended theology and pseudoscience, used his fortune to start the Race Betterment Foundation that promoted eugenics in Michigan and convened some of the first major U.S. conferences on eugenics in the 1910s. In the 1920s, E. S. Gosney, a self-made philanthropist, created the Human Betterment Foundation, which promoted forced sterilization in [Pasadena] California and reportedly influenced the Nazi eugenics program. The Charles F. Brush Foundation for the Betterment of the Human Race was founded in 1928 by the eponymous Cleveland inventor and industrialist with the aim of supporting eugenics research in Ohio and around the world. In 1948, several philanthropists including Procter & Gamble heir Dr. Clarence Gamble and hosiery magnate James G. Hanes, cofounded the Human Betterment League, an organization that pushed eugenic sterilization in North Carolina. Countless other names could be added to this list....
One of the most interesting tales from the history of philanthropy and eugenics is the career of Frederick H. Osborn. A longtime board member of the Carnegie Corporation of New York, Osborn was a president of the Eugenics Research Association and the author of the book Preface to Eugenics  (1940), launching what Time magazine hailed as a new “eugenics for democracy” that America could pursue without fear of being associated with the abuses becoming embarrassingly evident in the Third Reich. But in the book Osborn noted approvingly that “the inexcusable process of allowing feebleminded persons … to reproduce their kind is on the way to being checked in a number of states in which such persons may be sterilized.” Osborn was made president of the American Eugenics Society in 1946, and the key figure in sustaining philanthropy’s enthusiasm for eugenics after Nazi’s tarnished its reputation...successfully rebranding eugenics as medical genetics and “population control.”
In 1952, Osborn joined forces with John D. Rockefeller III to start the Population Council...to pursue many of the goals as the older eugenics organizations but without the unpleasant odor that had attached itself to eugenics. As late as 1967, when Osborn was in his late seventies, longtime Rockefeller Foundation executive Warren Weaver invited him to write the chapter on “population problems” for an authoritative volume on the history of American foundations. Osborn noted “we can foresee the time when all over the world the control of births is as much the accepted responsibility of governments as is at present their responsibility for the public health.”

Grandmaster Brzezinski geopolitical strategist wasn’t reading tea leafs in 1970
Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era
Zbigniew Brzezinski 1970
2012 "Strategic Vision", http://www.foreignaffairs.com/author/zbigniew-brzezinski
The post-industrial society is becoming a “technetronic” society: a society shaped culturally, psychologically, socially, and economically by the impact of technology and electronics—particularly in the area of computers and communications. [3]...Knowledge is a tool of power and the effective mobilization of talent an important way to acquire power. [5]...the
government has sponsored the transfer of many technological innovations from defense to private industry. [6]... the United States has been most active in the promotion of a global communications system by means of satellites, and is pioneering the development of a world-wide information grid. It is expected such a grid will come into being by about 1975. For the first time in history the cumulative knowledge of mankind will be made accessible on a global scale—and almost instantaneously available in response to demand.[10] ... techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm, thereby weakening a nation’s capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of the competitor” (Gordon J. F. MacDonald, “Space,” in Toward the Years 2018, p. 34). [11] ..man has always sought to crystallize some organizing principle that would, by creating order out of chaos, relate him to the universe and help define his place in it. [13]...Julian Huxley was perhaps guilty of only slight exaggeration when he warned “overcrowding in animals leads to distorted neurotic and downright pathological behavior. We can be sure that the same is true in principle of people. City life today is definitely leading to mass mental disease, to growing vandalism and possible eruptions of mass violence.” [14] G. N. Carstairs, in “Why is Man Aggressive?” (Impact of Science on Society, April-June 1968, p. 90), argues that population growth, crowding, and social oppression all contribute to irrational and intensified aggression. Experiments on rats seem to bear this out; observation of human behavior in large cities seems to warrant a similar conclusion...[15]

Speaking of a future at most decades away, an experimenter in intelligence control asserted, “I foresee a time when we shall have the means and therefore, inevitably, the temptation to manipulate the behavior and intellectual functioning of all the people through environmental and biochemical manipulation of the brain.” [16]
A society’s capacity for making such judgments, [discriminating between the necessity for order and the imperative of change], is bound to be undermined by the degree to which it becomes psychologically inured to living with violence and to accepting violence as a means for solving its problems....contemporaryAmerica is psychologically permeated by violence. Persisting social crisis, the emergence of a charismatic personality, and the exploitation of mass media to obtain public confidence would be the steppingstones in the piecemeal transformation of the United States into a highly controlled society....A certain measure of crime is accepted as unavoidable; for the sake of order, therefore, organized crime is generally preferred to anarchic violence, thus indirectly and informally becoming an extension of order...

The projected world information grid, for which Japan, Western Europe, and the United States are most suited, could create the basis for a common educational program, the adoption of common academic standards, the organized pooling of information, and a more rational division of labor in research and development... Such scientific-informational linkage would be easier to set up than joint educational programs and would encourage an international educational system by providing an additional stimulus to an international division of academic labor, uniform academic standards, and a cross-national pooling of academic resources....

In addition, it may be possible—and tempting—to exploit for strategic-political purposes the fruits of research on the brain and on human behavior. Gordon J. F. MacDonald, a geophysicist specializing in problems of warfare, has written that accurately timed, artificially excited electronic strokes “could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth...In this way, one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period... No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades. [26] [...]